White Collar War
Why do I get uncomfortable when President Bush asks each American
child
to send a dollar to feed Afghani children. Sociologically, his
request
reminds us to that the Afghani people are our same species.
Psychologically,
it focuses our minds away from anxiety over current and impending
terrorist
retaliation for our bombing campaign. Economically, it may save
our
parents a few tax dollars.
Have I fallen into so cynical a crevasse that I can no longer
entertain
the thought that our commander-in-chief is capable of a humanitarian
gesture?
But alas, a gesture is the only way I can view it. How much of
the
food we drop from the sky will reach the starving Afghanis who made the
impossible choice to leave their homes and alight to the border with
little
more than the clothes on their backs? According to disaster
relief
expert Steve,Hansch, our food drop will satisfy only one
one-hundred-thousandth
of the potential need.
If the world is a dysfunctional family, the U.S. is dad. Like
a molesting father who plies his child with candy, a wink and a
coercive
smile-- “We’ll just keep this our special little secret, alright?” --we
first bomb and then feed our Afghani victims. “Please love me—or
else. I just can’t help myself.” Like a violated child, the
Afghani people are in shock. Someone is reaching out to wipe away
their tears, offering a hug and a snack. How compassionate—except
that it’s the same thug who just raped them! What was it that
Lincoln
said about fooling the people?
Does anyone else see the irony in how we deliver subsistence
aid?
Bombing with vegetables makes for a sad attempt to mask another
parallel
with “The Evil Ones” as President Bush likes to call our
attackers.
5000 Americans died in New York and the Pentagon. Many times that
many will die of starvation fleeing our bombs.
But this is a white collar war. The people who make decisions
which they know will result in the deaths of tens of thousands of
innocents
do so from their posh, well appointed offices, not from the dark depths
of underground bunkers. Our white collared warriors are sitting
in
leather bound lazy boys, not squatting in the dirt. They don’t
pull
the trigger; they leave that up to naïvely patriotic young
soldiers—our
sons and daughters. They spin propaganda, labeling Bin Laden as
terrorist,
coward, evil one, proclaiming that his aim was to kill innocents.
But do the facts support their assumptions?
If bin Laden had wanted to maximize his killing, he could have
waited
for Sunday and aimed those four jets at American football
stadiums.
Assuming three out of four found their targets, some two hundred
thousand
people might have lost their lives. We can say that bin Laden’s goal
was
to send a message, striking at the heart of American business and
military
leadership. Are we not now sending a message to terrorists
around the globe, i.e., “attack us at your own risk”. We did not
accept bin Laden’s message and those we call terrorists won’t accept
ours.
The real difference between us and them is that most of our killing
is covert, indirect. Our policies in these countries lead to
conditions
of malnutrition, starvation, disease and despotic power struggles
resulting
in death on so a massive scale that it shrinks to statistical
insignificance
the 5000 Americans who died in this direct, overt attack. Which
is
more cowardly? Although it comprises only 4% of the
world’s
population, the United States controls and consumes over 40% of the
world’s
assets . Why? Is it because we’re smarter, more efficient,
more worthy than citizens of any other country on the
globe?
Or is the reality that we’ve taken more than our share? And how
does
that happen? Does the rest of the world simply hand us their
wealth
on an endless line of silver platters? No. We use our
wealth
and power, both overtly and covertly to assist American companies in
coercing
and manipulating the world to hand over the goods .
So drop your dollar into the collection basket. Help feed
the poor, starving Afghani children—or at least two percent of
them.
Then pat yourself on the back, say “Proud to be an American” and
stand in bewildered shock when twenty years from now, those few who
survived
our largesse, demonstrate their gratitude with another “terrorist”
attack.
Ron Bell
October 18, 2001
Editorials